Do we need a legislature, when the courts do as they please in regard to the Constitution and law? |
We know Conservative ideology, when
followed, produces positive results. But despite our votes for
Republicans, in overwhelming numbers, our left-tilting courts are
undermining the wishes of the voters.
It's time for the state's legislators
to take a look at these courts, and other appointed governing bodies,
to see that the will of the people is being done.
The S.C. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday
that the state does not provide a “minimally adequate” education
to children in poorly performing districts.
Technically the court is aligning with
Democrat politicians, and activists, to blame a lack of money for underachievement
and failure.
But in most every poorly performing
district, teenage pregnancy and single parents are at much higher
rates than more successful districts. Where Democrats rule, the
importance that sound moral decisions have on success, seems to take a backseat. Other social factors, like dependency
on government, plague areas of our state that never seem to do any
better academically, despite giving them more and more money.
In his dissent, SCOSC Justice John
Kittredge wrote: “I view the Court’s decision as a policy opinion
on the state of public education in South Carolina, in direct
contravention of what this Court said it would not do in Abbeville I
— act as a ‘super-legislature.’”
And he is 100 percent correct. It is
the court trying to overwrite policy.
The S.C. Supreme Court, also on
Wednesday, with the stroke of a pen, revoked the life sentences of 15
young murderers because their victims were killed while their
murderers were juveniles.
The SCOSC said the juveniles have less
capacity for mature decision-making, so they get a “get-out-of-jail
free” card. Soft-on-crime liberals only spur more violence and
murder. We any ill afford any more.
And it's not just judges. The S.C.
Board of Education has let leftwing propaganda get into our high
school courses. Our students are being taught a negative view of U.S.
history, that omits important historical figures and events in an
Advanced Placement U.S. history course. The course is being reviewed
with no assurance – based on its affection for Common Core - the SC
Education Board will find in favor of America. The course, critical
of the U.S., does not mention U.S. founding fathers, civil rights
leaders and military heroes.
Also on Wednesday , a lone federal
judge (Gergel) stuck down a South Carolina constitutional provision
that defined marriage between a man and a woman. That definition of
marriage was supported by almost 80 percent of the South Carolina's
voters.
So it's not just a state problem with
leftwing activist judges. As Republican numbers are lifted by our
voters, for federal offices, we need an effort to better vet judges
to make sure the Constitution is their guide, not leftist political
whims.
No comments:
Post a Comment