UPDATED: SC Coast in DANGER of Mass Flooding, says Climate "scientists"

Discredited Global Warming
"scientist" Michael Mann,
spoofed for his junk science.

WLTX , a Columbia TV station, is reporting “Rising sea levels will mean extreme floods along the coast of the Carolinas in coming years."
UPDATE: The AP has also reported this"study" that some see as junk science The AP reported without questioning it. Columbia's The State newspaper included it in its coverage. 
Billions of dollars of property is in danger, according to new reports from a nonprofit group of scientists.
“The report found that in South Carolina, the coast is likely to see extreme floods of more than 4 feet above high tide within 40 years.” WLTX reported: “The danger zone includes 54,000 homes and $24 billion in property.”
Climate Central (CC) based in New Jersey, released its “analysis of the danger faced in South Carolina" on Monday.
Challengers of climate "science" have asked for e-mail, and information on funding.The "researchers" have avoided disclosure, even though public money is involved.
WLTX is publicizing, without any questioning, the urgent warning from the leftwing Global Warming advocates.
As usual, the catastrophe will not happen until four decades from now. But we must act today - global warming activists tell us - to forestall the coming disaster.
Climate Central supports the work of “climate scientist” Dr Michael Mann. Mann has been mired in legal action because of the skepticism his claims have triggered.
As Global Warming Alarmists have warned for years, a report for North Carolina released last week was dire, too. These "scientists" say we must change, stop abusing the planet, and pay more taxes to fund planet-saving efforts. An analysis for Georgia due next week will no doubt predict the same fate.
According to CC, North Carolina has more than 2,000 square miles of land and $9 billion in property less than 4 feet above the high tide line.
North Carolina is not as Republican as South Carolina, but no one asked if political opposition had anything to do with CC's reports. There was no word on whether the CC operated like Obama's IRS.